First, there is the obvious
need for technical knowledge. Everyone has their own method to gather this. Conventional
wisdom tends to support knowledge gained through experience and the watchful guidance of a
competent mentor. Many individuals take the examination to find out where they are weak
with the intention of taking it again until they manage to pass. With the EndWise.com
database of over 3,000 questions weak areas are easily identified so the first time you
take the CIH examination will also be the last.
The Board's requirement for experience is based on activity on a
professional or journeyman level. This causes a sticking point for many who find they are
in a position that has them named as Industrial Hygienist, or Project Manager, when their
scope of practice relies on strict adherence to a regulatory interpretation or exercise of
very little independently and practicing with a scope of extreme variability and many
unknowns. This should be portrayed in the Professional Reference Questionnaire (PRQ) to be
fair to the applicant. Details are important to the Board in making their evaluation of an
applicant.
The ABIH also has a process it follows to review each application
and prepare each examination. Examinations are prepared in a minute detail. Each question
is evaluated by a group of practicing CIH's to ensure it is correct and relevant to the
practice of IH. Each item is rated on difficulty for its target audience- CORE or
Comprehensive, and this is used to set the passing score for each test. Each question is
also rated by professional testers to ensure its validity as a question for an
examination. Questions are selected for use on an examination based on the latest survey
of the practice of current practice and some historical knowledge. And after each
presentation of the examination, questions are again reviewed for validity.
The examination itself is the subject of an effort to ensure that
is adheres to the standardized evaluation method. The passing score has remained within a
narrow range, but the percentage of those passing have gone from 62.7 of all those sitting
for the Comprehensive examination in 1979 to 46.4 percent in 1997 (with a similar drop in
the CORE rates). Reasons for this drop are not easily documented, but there are many
offered. Specialization of practice, lack of mentoring, taking the exam before being truly
ready-these have all been proposed.